Back to Questions
Want to know:
Under the Articles of Confederation, the greatest amount of power was in the hands of who?
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Peter and Catherine the Great shared all of these in common EXCEPT
- What is the biochemical basis for the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections?The bacteria have a mutation in the transpeptidase enzyme that prevents methicillin inhibition without altering transpeptidase activity.The bacteria express a variant of the beta-lactamase enzyme that is inhibited by methicillin to prevent methicillin from inhibiting transpeptidase.The bacteria have an activated efflux pump that removes methicillin from the cell to prevent it from inhibiting transpeptidase.The bacteria convert methicillin into D-glutamate, which is a substrate for transpeptidase and thereby stimulates cell wall synthesis.
- Elbridge Gerry, letter to the Massachusetts state legislature, 1787"It was painful for me, on a subject of such national importance, to differ from the respectable members who signed the Constitution; but conceiving, as I did, that the liberties of America were not secured by the system, it was my duty to oppose it."My principal objections to the plan are, that there is no adequate provision for a representation of the people; . . . that some of the powers of the legislature are ambiguous . . . ; that the executive is blended with, and will have an undue influence over, the legislature; that the judicial department will be oppressive; . . . and that the system is without the security of a bill of rights. These are objections which are not local, but apply equally to all the states."As the Convention was called for the 'sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation . . . ,' I did not conceive that these powers extend to the formation of the plan proposed; but the Convention being of a different opinion, I acquiesced [agreed] in it, being fully convinced that, to preserve the Union, an efficient government was indispensably necessary, and that it would be difficult to make proper amendments to the Articles of Confederation."The Constitution proposed has few, if any, federal features, but is rather a system of national government. Nevertheless, in many respects, I think it has great merit, and, by proper amendments, may be adapted. . . ."Others may suppose that the Constitution may be safely adopted, because therein provision is made to amend it. But cannot this object be better attained before a ratification than after it? And should a free people adopt a form of government under conviction that it wants [needs] amendment?"Arguments for creating a stronger federal government arose primarily as the result of long-term concerns about the