Want to know:

The president privately discusses with his staff a decision to increase economic sanctions on Iran. Before a final decision is made, a draft of the proposal is leaked to a reporter. The president orders the reporter and her newspaper to suspend publication of the plan, citing issues of national and economic security. Which of the following best indicates how a court would rule in this case if the Supreme Court's ruling in New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) was used as a precedent?Required to answer. Single choice.(1/1 Point)Freedom of the press includes a heavy presumption against government censorship, and the documents can be published by the press.Although the documents have already been obtained by the press, a court must review the documents prior to publication to ensure that no information that threatens national security is made public.Because the president's staff leaked the documents and the newspaper obtained them in a legal manner, they may be published without prior restraint.The president has the authority to stop the publication of the story because the administration has asserted that the information in the story threatens national security

Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.