Want to know:
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the separation of powers is integral to the Constitution not to preserve the prerogatives of each branch of government but to divide governmental powers among the branches so as to keep power diffused—and thereby limited and protective of personal freedom. . . .Thus, even if one branch of government consented to ceding an essential power to another branch, such a giveaway would be unconstitutional. . . .Can the president legally use military force to attack a foreign land without a serious threat or legal obligation or a declaration of war from Congress? In a word: No. Here is the back story. . . .. . . [A] bipartisan group of senators offered legislation supported by the president that . . . would permit a president to strike whomever and wherever he pleases. The president would be restrained only by a vote of Congress—after hostilities have commenced.Such a statute would give the president far more powers than he has now, would directly violate Congress' war-making powers by ceding them away to the president, would defy the Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of giving away core governmental functions, would commit the U.S. to foreign wars without congressional and thus popular support, and would invite dangerous mischief by any president wanting to attack any enemy—real or imagined, old or new—for foreign or domestic political purposes, whether American interests are at stake or not.Andrew Napolitano, "At War with the Separation of Powers," The Washington Times, 2018.Which of the following principles of government is most related to the author's argument in the passage?A. Separation of powers is necessary to our constitutional system to limit the power of the three branches and guarantee limited government.B. The president's power is constitutionally permitted to expand during times of crisis, which can lead to the use of force without permission from Congress.C. As the legislative branch, Congress is authorized to change the constitutional balance of power whenever it deems necessary.D. Separation of powers guarantees that each branch can focus on what it does best, but in some cases one branch may voluntarily cede power to another branch.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Under the separate but equal doctrine in the 1920s and 1930s, the amount of money that the state of Texas spent on black students was ______ the amount spent on white students in public schools.
- A United States Supreme Court justice has announced his retirement at the end of the current Supreme Court term. What is the most likely presidential action in response to this announcement?a. Confer with House leadership to discuss potential nomineesb. Confer with the chief justice to discuss potential nomineesc. Nominate a federal judge who shares the president's ideologyd. Nominate a sitting senator of the majority party
- To virtually eliminate the threat of a filibuster, the Senate would have to have a minimum of how many members from one party?