Want to know:
pedestrian from State A sued a motorcyclist from State B. The pedestrian properly filed suit in a state court located in the Eastern District of State A and sought $100,000 in damages for the tortious injuries caused by the motorcyclist's allegedly negligent acts in the Western District of State A.motorcyclist filed a notice of removal in the federal court for the Eastern District of State A, which geographically embraces the location of where the action was originally filed.Is removal proper?A. Yes, because the requirements of complete diversity are satisfied.B. Yes, because the lawsuit was filed in state court in the Eastern District of State A.C. No, because the motorcyclist is a citizen of State B.D. No, because the accident occurred in the Western District of State A.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- The right of redemption allows a mortgagor, before foreclosure, to get back land upon payment of the full amount of the debt.
- After New York City law enforcement gets wind that the Islamic State is about to perpetrate a terrorist attack, it launches an investigation and Mohammed (domiciled in New Jersey) ends up locked in a cell for 23 hours a day under an "interrogate and hold program" in New York City after he is picked up while working at an investment firm in New York City. After getting released, he sues New York City for racial discrimination under New York law in New York state court, alleging that all those subject to the "interrogate and hold" program were Arab Muslims. New York City removes to federal court and files a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. New York state has an identical version of Rule 8, but it has rejected Iqbal and held that Doe provides the proper standard to assess complaints. The federal court dismissed Mohammed's complaint and now the case is on appeal. True or false, under York, the appeals court will apply New York state's pleading standard?
- a net 1231 gain becomes ordinary while a net 1231 loss become long-term capital gain