Back to Questions
Want to know:
Nvidia, a California corporation, manufactures tegra ultra graphics cards specially for Nintendo's new version of the Switch, the 2.0. Nintendo, a Japanese corporation, only sells the 2.0 Switch in Japan and the tegra ultra graphics card is only used for the 2.0 switch. One day, Yuki Hoyabashi buys the console, then a year later, decides to move to America, becomes an American citizen, and settles in New Hampshire. While Hoyabashi is on vacation in Alaska, the console explodes, causing her injuries. Hoyabashi returns to New Hampshire where she has surgery to treat her injuries, and files suit in New Hampshire federal court, seeking $37,500 for her medical injuries and $38,000 for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Nvidia files a joint motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 15 days after the complaint was served on a security guard at the gate of Nvidia's California campus. Three days, later Nvidia files a motion to dismiss for improper service and a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. What result?A.The court will dismiss, but only because service of process was improper under the federal rules.B.The court will dismiss because Nvidia had no purposeful contacts with New Hampshire and because service of process was improper.C.The court will dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the amount in controversy is unmet.D.The court will deny all motions.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Which of the following classes of individual are NOT usually susceptible to undue influence?
- penalties under PD 704 for certain forms of illegal fishing
- In year 1 (the current year), OCC Corp. made a charitable donation of $200,000 to the Jordan Spieth Family Foundation (a qualifying charity). For the year, OCC reported taxable income of $1,500,000 before deducting any charitable contributions, before deducting its $20,000 dividends-received deduction, and before deducting its $40,000 NOL carryover from last year.a. What amount of the $200,000 donation is OCC allowed to deduct for tax purposes in year 1?b. In year 2, OCC did not make any charitable contributions. It reported taxable income of $300,000 before any charitable contribution deductions and before a $15,000 dividends-received deduction. What book-tax difference associated with the charitable contributions will OCC report in year 2? Is the difference favorable or unfavorable? Is it permanent or temporary?c. In year 2, OCC did not make any charitable contributions. It reported taxable income of $300,000 before any charitable contribution deductions and before a $15,000 dividends-received deduction. In years 3, 4, and 5, OCC reported taxable losses of $50,000. Finally, in year 6 it reported $1,000,000 in taxable income before any charitable contribution deductions. It did not have any dividends-received deduction. OCC did not actually make any charitable donations in year 6. What book-tax difference associated with charitable contributions will OCC report in year 6?