Back to Questions
Want to know:
completion of the act that caused the apprehension-if it results in harm to the plaintiff
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Vivian sues Nicole for trespass. Nicole does not file a motion to dismiss and instead files an answer denying liability. At the close of discovery, Nicole files a motion for summary judgment. At the hearing, Vivian thinks the judge is inclined to rule against her and decides to voluntarily dismiss her case. She files a notice to dismiss her case. Trial has not yet happened. True or false, Vivian can voluntarily dismiss the case without prejudice.
- Jed tells his ailing mother that unless she lends him money for a business investment he will never see her again. She agrees but later changes her mind and asks for her money back. Jed claims that they have formed a binding contract. Why might the contract be voidable?
- After New York City law enforcement gets wind that the Islamic State is about to perpetrate a terrorist attack, it launches an investigation and Mohammed (domiciled in New Jersey) ends up locked in a cell for 23 hours a day under an "interrogate and hold program" in New York City after he is picked up while working at an investment firm in New York City. After getting released, he sues New York City for racial discrimination under New York law in New York state court, alleging that all those subject to the "interrogate and hold" program were Arab Muslims. New York City removes to federal court and files a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. New York state has an identical version of Rule 8, but it has rejected Iqbal and held that Doe provides the proper standard to assess complaints. The federal court dismissed Mohammed's complaint and now the case is on appeal. True or false, under York, the appeals court will apply New York state's pleading standard?