Back to Questions
Want to know:
A corporation sues B corporation and C corporation. It asserts that B and C corporations have violated the federal government's antitrust laws by conspiring to prevent it from selling its computer monitors in South Carolina. It devotes 10 paragraphs full of detailed allegations to explaining why the federal antitrust laws were violated. It also brings a South Carolina Unfair Practices Act claim, arguing in 2 paragraphs in the complaint that B and C corporation engaged in illegal practices in convincing electronics retailers not to carry its monitors. B and C corporation file a motion to dismiss the South Carolina Unfair Practices Act claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. All are domiciled in South Carolina. True or false, there is supplemental jurisdiction over the South Carolina Unfair Practices Act Claim?A.TrueB.False
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Chris (a Biden supporter) and Jake (a Trump supporter) walk into a bar. At first, they engage in some friendly discussion about vaccine mandates, critical race theory, and the events on January 6. When the discussion turns to recent North Carolina Court of Appeals decisions about whether to follow the Mas or Gordon approach to domicile, however, the conversation quickly deteriorates into nasty ad hominem attacks. Chris insults Jake's mother, insinuating that she doesn't even know where she's domiciled while everyone in the area gasps in astonishment. Flying into a rage, Jake attacks Chris with a chair. Chris sues Jake for assault and battery and alleges $40,000 in damages. Jake counterclaims for slander and alleges $40,000 in damages. This meets the amount in controversy.A.TrueB.False
- Factual Application70) Which of the following is true of duress?A) It is liable for fraud.B) A threat should involve physical harm for it to be actionable as duress.C) It is a threat issued to make another person sign a contract.D) Intoxicating a person to sign a contract is considered duress.
- when are we required to use accrual based accounting?